Strategies for the inclusion of alkaline foods in the diets served to hospitalized patients in the CMDLT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55361/cmdlt.v14iSuplemento.153Keywords:
Acid-base balance, metabolic acidosis, Potential Renal Acid Load, Osteoporosis, Diabetes mellitus, UrolithiasisAbstract
Subclinical metabolic acidosis resulting from an acid load in the diet can be a risk factor for various pathologies. Objective: To determine if through nutritional education strategies it is possible to modify the behavior of hospitalized patients regarding the choice of alkaline foods from the diets served in the CMDLT. Methods: the Potential Renal Acid Load (PRAL) of four types of diets was analyzed: complete (C), gastric protection (PG), low sodium (H) and for diabetics (D). A video, a talk and three support brochures were designed as educational strategies for hospitalized patients. Patients' preferences were identified when selecting acidic and alkaline foods before and after the educational intervention (EI). Results: PRAL (mEq/day) before and after IE was: <0: 9 vs 26 patients; 0-20: 11 vs 21; >20: 40 vs 13. After EI, 49 (81.6%) patients decreased the PRAL of their diet and 11 (18.4%) increased it (p<0.0001). The mean PRAL for all diets chosen by the patients before vs. after IE was 29.35 vs. 4.60 (p<0.0001): diet C 27.67 vs. 2.43; PG diet 89.55 vs -10.1; H diet 22.27 vs -10.61; diet D 35.66 vs 30.53. The average PRAL of all the diets chosen by the patients for breakfast, lunch and dinner before vs after EI was 20.32 vs 16.32 (p<0.01), 0.02 vs -11, 80 (p<0.001) and 10.38 vs 0.55 (p<0.0001) respectively. Conclusions: The food combinations chosen by the patients before EI had an acid PRAL. Most patients significantly decreased dietary PRAL after EI.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Científica CMDLT

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.



